We often discuss PR with international companies and everyone
always refers to "the Nordics" or "the Nordic region". From an
international PR budget terms Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden and
to a lesser extent, Iceland, get bunched together and seen as one
regional market.
If you ask a Dane or Swede, Norwegian or Finn about how often
they think about themselves as being Nordic they say "hardly ever".
On one very general level we are very similar across all these
countries, but look closer and we are also very different. Some of
the media may be owned by the same publishers, like Schibsted and
IDG, but from a PR perspective there is very little crossover of
news stories. Swedes, Danes and Norwegians may understand each
other, but often discussions between these nationalities happen in
English, and everyone feeling a little bit ashamed that they don't
understand the other languages well enough. Finnish is totally
different from the other Nordic languages so here English is
definitely necessary! If you ask a journalist or PR consultant in
Sweden about the media situation in Denmark, he may know the big
newspapers but that's as far as it goes. PR agencies in one market
very rarely work across the region, and if they do it's almost
always via a partner or through a separate office. Even on existing
longterm clients there is no more contact between the different
national PR teams than there would be between a PR team in the UK,
France and Germany. So is there no Nordic sense of belonging at
all? Well, yes there is, in the same way as we all feel European,
we can feel Nordic. One example is looking at research results or
surveys. If we've only been covered as "the Nordic region" we will
show interest. But present individual research results for Sweden,
Finland, Norway, Denmark and Iceland and we will immediately get
excited, start comparing and appoint winners and losers!